Workshop Evaluation Form

Workshop on the Use of Technology for Museums of the Pacific Islands Region

To help plan future activities, please rate aspects of the workshop on a scale from 1 to 7:

(1) Very Poor (2) Unsatisfactory (3) Borderline (4) Satisfactory (5) Good (6) Very Good (7) Excellent.

Content

  1. The workshop content was:
  2. Pace was:
  3. Exercises were:
  4. Content was relevant:
  5. Did the workshop meet your needs?:

Facilities

  1. The trainer was:
  2. Audio-visual material was:
  3. The workshop room was:
  4. The food was:

Overall

  1. Before the workshop my knowledge of the topic was:
  2. After the workshop my knowledge of the topic was:
  3. Overall the workshop was:
  4. What would you suggest changing?
  5. What was best about the workshop?
  6. What was worst about the workshop?
  7. Any other comments and suggestions?

Web page by Tom Worthington, 17 July 2005. Comments to: webmaster@tomw.net.au